“Are you serious? Are you serious?”

Thus goes the famous quote by Speaker Nancy Pelosi, when asked to indicate the constitutionality of specific parts of the health care bill.

Now, as WorldNetDaily reports, the incoming GOP congressmen and congresswomen are pushing for legislation that will require an outline of constitutionality for proposed bills. This commitment will “require every bill to cite its specific constitutional authority”.

This is sickening. We are continually missing golden opportunities for beneficial change, because a few men and women can’t get their heads around the fact that the Constitution, written over 200 years ago, was not actually intended to remain a static document, to be followed to the letter. The Constitution was written to be flexible; the writers knew that they could not possibly guess what would happen in future years. The founding fathers (I’m using this for the sake of avoiding redundancy, although I find this to be an overused phrase, generally for fear-mongering and the very static interpretations I disagree with) didn’t even expect the Constitution to last for very long. We are not living in the late 1700s any longer; this is 2010, and we need legislation that is not specifically called for.

The United States of America has the some of the worst health care coverage on the world, yet attempts for reform are continually shot down in the House. The offending members of Congress cite unconstitutionality, socialism; all utter nonsense. Granted, the proposed health care bill would be more socialistic, but to say that it is socialism is unfounded idiocy. Political systems are not pure democracy, pure socialism; they are in a continuum. To say that passing a health care bill that would benefit millions of Americans unable to afford health care, a health care bill that would benefit millions of Americans with preexisting conditions, would bring our government into socialism is selfish, arrogant, and downright stupid.

Progressives, by nature, stretch the Constitution in the way that it was intended to be stretched, because they realize that we cannot function solely on what is outlined in a document over 200 years old. This proposal for a bill that requires the outlining of constitutionality is not a simple means to protect American freedom, it is a political attack aimed at  completely removing the power of any other political party. The definition of “conservative” should be noted here: “a person who is reluctant to accept changes and new ideas”, from WorldNet, a Princeton University lexical database. The House of Representatives will soon be dominated by these, and they will do everything in their power to force their views into every inch of our government, barring any forward motion by any forward-thinking individual. They, if anything, are attacking our freedoms, because this bill is a flat-out denial of anything except that which follows their own political agendas. #

– adh

Advertisements

15 responses to ““Are you serious? Are you serious?”

  1. manjo banjo kranjo is a ho just like you abanjo panjo ganjo but your a bigger ho than he is abanjo kranjo stanjo lanjo

  2. As we disapprove of censorship, your posts were not deleted, “abhishek parekh”. However, note that you have earned kjk’s inaugural Seal of Disapproval.

    • kjk :
      As we disapprove of censorship, your posts were not deleted, “abhishek parekh”. However, note that you have earned kjk’s inaugural Seal of Disapproval.

      I support your views of censorship but note that this is not an “Abhishek Parekh” nor an “Manoj”! Keep guessing

  3. This is a juvenile game. You may quit any time; we’re not here to provide a platform for your childish brand of humour.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s